Infographic from https://twitter.com/UNFPA/status/487695174446100482/photo/1
In the rush to produce infographics, there is a risk of focusing more on the clarity of the message at the cost of transparency of evidence.
Without in any way wanting to raise questions about the value of reproductive health and rights programs, I found this infographic less than satisfactory-
Read the whole post –> Overstating findings: impact of family planning
Posted by: Jane Davidson
Looking for a new buzzword to toss into the conversation next time you are socializing with your favorite evaluators or clients? How about this one:
anecdata (noun). information which is presented as if it is based on serious research but is in fact based on what someone thinks is true
Read the whole post –> Anecdata
I raised a few eyebrows last week when I mentioned the idea of Evaluation-Specific Methodology (ESM) as being an essential part of what defines us as a discipline.
Of course, a large proportion of people who identify as evaluators consider that evaluation is merely the application of social science research methods to support decision
Read the whole post –> Evaluation-Specific Methodology: The methodologies that are distinctive to evaluation
Picture of Hong Kong from The Economist
Is the woeful level of analysis of research studies a sign of the pressure on existing media services to push out more news with fewer resources?
Here’s another one. [Disclosure: Melbourne, long tagged “one of the world’s most livable cities” is my home town].
Read the whole post –> Fixing the race – Sydney “world’s fifth most liveable city”