Category Archives: Evaluation team composition

Specialist evaluators or content-free evaluators?

Posted on June 17, 2011 by Patricia Rogers

One of the continuing debates in evaluation is about the relative benefits of choosing an evaluator with significant content knowledge compared to a more experienced evaluator with little or no content knowledge.  As is often the case, the answer depends … Continue reading →

Posted in Evaluation team composition | Tagged | 6 Comments

Alpine whaling? – Interesting developments in evidence-based policy, episode 2

Posted on March 11, 2011 by Patricia Rogers

While Japan has ‘scientific whaling’, Australia might be beginning a phase of ‘scientific alpine grazing’, reversing a policy of removing cattle from summer grazing in alpine national park in the name of research. (Thanks to a number of GenuineEvaluation readers … Continue reading →

Posted in Adequate scope, Appropriate criteria and standards, Appropriate inference, Appropriate measurement, Appropriate reporting, Commissioning evaluation, Evaluation team composition, Evaluative questions & answers, The client's role, Use of evaluation, Values-based | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Australian book launch of ‘Purposeful Program Theory’, Canberra 17 March

Posted on March 11, 2011 by Patricia Rogers

After years working on this with my co-author Sue Funnell, I’m looking forward to the launch of the book Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models in Canberra next Thursday (Yes, on St Patrick’s Day). … Continue reading →

Posted in Causal inference, Evaluation team composition, Evaluation Theory, Recommended books, Uncategorized, Use of evaluation | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The importance of visible, high level commitment to evaluation

Posted on August 20, 2010 by Patricia Rogers

One of the favorite stories I tell about evaluation is about going to meet a senior manager to discuss evaluation and finding him standing on a table in the middle of an open-plan office, with the staff gathered around him, … Continue reading →

Posted in Evaluation team composition, Government programs, Learning from failure, The client's role | 4 Comments

9 golden rules for commissioning a waste-of-money evaluation

Posted on June 9, 2010 by Jane Davidson

There may well be some managers out there who have yet to experience the thrill of commissioning a total waste-of-money evaluation. Well, thankfully, your colleagues around the world have been working diligently on building a knowledge base just for you! Continue reading →

Posted in Evaluation team composition, Learning from failure, The client's role | Tagged , , , , | 29 Comments