The Friday Funny: Passion

In a post earlier this week (9 hot tips for commissioning, managing (and doing!) actionable evaluation), Jane offered this advice for evaluation contractors:

  1. Help the client figure out whether or not you are the right fit by getting really clear about your brand – “who you are” as an evaluation practitioner or organization. What distinguishes you from the rest of the pack? What are your core values? Your “signature skill sets”? Your unique value proposition?

In this week’s Friday Funny, we are sharing a hilarious cautionary reminder from David Mitchell (commentator for The Guardian in the UK) about how those statements about your unique qualities can often turn out to be (1) not nearly as unique as you thought – because everyone is saying them and (2) implausible exaggerations of who you really are.

(If you can’t see it below, you’ll need to click through to the video)

David Mitchell’s soap box: Passion

In this week’s episode, David gets passionate about the subject of, er, passion

Posted in Friday Funnies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

9 hot tips for commissioning, managing (and doing!) actionable evaluation

High quality, worthwhile, actionable evaluation doesn’t just depend on the technical competence and effective consultation skills of the evaluator.

Decisions made and actions taken (or not taken) by the client can make or break the value of evaluation for an organization.

High-value evaluation is the product of a fruitful interaction between a well-informed client and a responsive, appropriately skilled evaluation team.

What have we – both clients and evaluators – learned from both stunningly high value evaluative work (“dream projects”) and bitter disappointments (a.k.a. “Nightmares on Eval Street”)?

And, how can evaluators help clients get maximum utilization and value for their evaluation dollar by becoming informed, demanding, savvy consumers of (and partners in) evaluation?

There is much that the client can do to get evaluation on the right track at the outset, in the commissioning (e.g. RfP) phase.

The same is true when it comes to working alongside the evaluation team to ensure the client organization’s needs are met, and that the insights and learnings from evaluation are both influential and used. [This point holds whether the evaluation is participatory or independent.]

There is a LOT to say on this topic, so I’m giving just a taster of ideas here. Over the next few weeks and months I’ll be picking up on each of these – and more – and fleshing them out a bit more and expanding on some earlier material.

6 hot tips for evaluation clients:

  1. Save time and energy with a two-phase process: “Expression of Interest” (EoIs) to shortlist qualified bidders followed by a full RFP to select the right team
  2. Select contractors based on capabilities, not an evaluation plan they have written ‘blind’ (i.e. without speaking with stakeholders)
  3. Use our list of great questions that cut to the chase and reveal the evaluation team’s approach, capabilities, and fit with the project
  4. Ask for a ‘skeleton report’ before any data are collected so you can discuss what you need as an end product
  5. Consider not requesting a long final report at all – they are seldom read; often, presentations and short written updates at several time points are more useful and usable
  6. Have a contingency plan for ‘pulling the plug’

3 hot tips for evaluation contractors:

  1. Help the client figure out whether or not you are the right fit by getting really clear about your brand – “who you are” as an evaluation practitioner or organization. What distinguishes you from the rest of the pack? What are your core values? Your “signature skill sets”? Your unique value proposition?
  2. Put serious time and effort in at the front end to ensure you clearly understand the client’s needs, including any decision timelines (e.g. MQP’s point that summative decisions are often made 18 months ahead of time, but usually evaluation findings available then have only been designed with formative uses in mind)
  3. Develop an overarching set of big-picture evaluation questions to guide the work – and talk through with the client what a real answer would look like, to them

What would you add to this list? Fire away in the comments section below!

It’s time for a radical rethink of the RFP process and the usual approach to evaluation project management – watch this space!

Related posts:

 

Posted in Commissioning evaluation, Evaluation team composition, Managing evaluation (as a client), The client's role | 3 Comments

The Friday Funny – failing to take account of evaluative information

We’re not sure if this is a metaphor for individuals or organizations that don’t take account of evaluative information. What do you think?

 

 

Posted in Friday Funnies | 4 Comments

Time is ticking away to submit proposals for the AEA conference, 24-27 October, Minneapolis

[UPDATE: Proposals closed at midnight EST Friday 16 March for the American Evaluation Association conference in Minneapolis. As a community service we provided a countdown clock to the deadline.]

Check the conference information pages for information about proposal types, including the new brown bag and Ignite formats, and how to submit

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Friday Funny – replicating successful strategies

In an environment where discussions of evidence-based policy and practice sometimes focus exclusively on identifying ‘what works’ and scaling it up, we thought it timely to share this story where the joke is on the Australians.  The joke has been published in many different places – including a South African government bulletin – we found this version at the South Africans in London Club.

Three South Africans and three Australians are travelling by train to a cricket match at the World Cup in England. At the station, the three Aussies each buy a ticket and watch as the three South Africans buy just one ticket between them.

“How are the three of you going to travel on only one ticket?” asks one of the Aussies. “Watch and learn,” replied one of the South Africans.

They all board the train. The Aussies take their respective seats but all three South Africans cram into a toilet and close the door behind them.

Shortly after the train departs from the Station, the conductor comes around collecting tickets. He knocks on the toilet door and says,
“Ticket please.” The door opens just a crack and a single arm emerges with a ticket in hand. The conductor takes it and moves on.

The Aussies see this and agree it was quite a clever idea. So after the game they decide to copy the South Africans on the return trip and save some money – (them being clever with money, and all that!).

When they get to the station, they buy a single ticket for the return trip. To their astonishment, the South Africans don’t buy a ticket at all.

“How are you going to travel without a ticket?” asked one very perplexed Aussie.

“Watch and learn,” answered a South African.

When they board the train the three Aussies cram into a toilet and soon after the three South Africans cram into another one nearby.

The train departs and shortly afterwards, one of the South Africans emerges and walks over to the toilet where the Aussies are hiding. He knocks on the door and says, “Ticket please” …

 


Posted in Appropriate inference, Friday Funnies | Tagged , | Leave a comment