-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Michael Scriven on The Friday Funny: Challenge, pressure, and performance
- David Onder on The Friday Funny – every presentation
- Stephanie Evergreen on The Friday Funny – every presentation
- Gabriel Della-Piana on Evaluation on autopilot – Environment Protection Agency,Victoria
- Jane Davidson on The Friday Funny – which one of these two is the evaluator?
Archives
Tag Archives: WWC
What constitutes “evidence”? Implications for cutting-edge, tailored treatments, and small sub-populations
In the medical profession in particular, there are some very rigid beliefs about what constitutes good enough “evidence of effectiveness” to justify offering, recommending, allowing patients to try, or even just not vehemently opposing a particular type of treatment for a patient.
There are some glimmers of hope in other sectors (e.g. in the Best Evidence Synthesis work here in New Zealand). But there are still three areas where there are very serious challenges in building a credible evidence base given the kinds of constraints and realities surrounding them. They are: (1) cutting-edge treatments; (2) treatments that are by their very nature tailored/individualized rather than standardized across patients or populations; and (3) learning what works for small sub-populations Continue reading
Jane at Real Evaluation
Patricia at CIRCLE (RMIT)