Tag Archives: XGEMs

Commissioning XGEMs – the sequel

In Monday’s post, Extreme Genuine Evaluation Makeovers (XGEMs) for Commissioning, I discussed a way of kicking off the process of selecting an evaluator for a project by suggesting that well-designed EOIs would often be more informative, less onerous (on both … Continue reading

Posted in Causal inference, Commissioning evaluation, Evaluative questions & answers, Learning from failure, The client's role, Values-based | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Extreme Genuine Evaluation Makeovers (XGEMs) for Commissioning

There may well be some managers out there who have yet to experience the thrill of commissioning a total waste-of-money evaluation. In a keynote for the recent Australasian Evaluation Society conference, I talked about the incredibly ineffective commissioning processes that are often used and that frequently result in evaluations that are, as we say in this part of the planet, “about as much use as an ashtray on a motorbike”. Some of the most important problems are: Continue reading

Posted in Commissioning evaluation, The client's role | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Genuine evaluation-related workshops and presentations over the next few months

One of the great sources of energy and ideas for both of us is the opportunity to give workshops and presentations on topics related to genuine evaluation. It’s great to be able to spend time with so many people who … Continue reading

Posted in Adequate scope, Appropriate criteria and standards, Appropriate reporting, Professional development | Tagged , , | 2 Comments